Review of Microsoft's Hyper-V Virtualization

Hyper-V is a Cost Effective Hypervisor Solution for MS Windows Shops

© John Wu

Nov 9, 2009
Windows Virtualization Solution With Hyper-V, Christian G
Although the feature set of Microsoft's Hyper-V is nowhere near as rich as VMware's ESX, it is a very cost effective solution for Windows shops with MS Volume Licensing.

Hyper-V is Microsoft's answer to VMware ESX and other hypervisor based virtualization solutions. For those who are virtualizing Windows servers, Hyper-V presents a compelling Windows virtualization solution based on much lower cost and a feature set that's good enough for many Windows based IT shops.

Those who remember Microsoft Virtual Server should know that Hyper-V is a complete rewrite and is a different piece of software. Microsoft Virtual Server is a host based virtualization solution, which is too slow for a production enterprise environment. On the other hand, Hyper-V is a hypervisor based virtualization solution that's very well suited for high performance production environments.

Hyper-V CPU and I/O Performance

Hyper-V requires hardware assisted virtualization such as Intel VT-X or AMD-V which makes virtualization run fast. The consequence of requiring CPU based virtualization assistance also means Hyper-V will not run on old hardware and that it will only work on 64-bit Windows Server 2008.

I/O performance was independently tested by storage vendor Qlogic with results that show Hyper-V performed at 88% to 99% of native performance, depending on the storage subsystem used.

Hyper-V Quick Migration

With Hyper-V's Quick Migration, a virtual machine is suspended while it's being copied over the network to another physical server. The duration a virtual machine is down is short, but there is still downtime.

Guest Operating Systems Compatible With Hyper-V

The list of operating systems includes nearly all of the operating systems most IT shops are concerned about. Operating systems supported include:

  • Windows Server 2008
  • Windows Server 2003 SP2 R2
  • Windows Server 2000 SP4 and Advanced Server
  • Windows 7
  • Windows Vista
  • Windows XP Professional
  • SuSE Linux 10
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5.2 and later

Hyper-V is Much Cheaper Than VMWare or Citrix XenServer

The reason to buy Hyper-V is due to cost, especially for a Windows shop. Windows Server 2008 Datacenter Edition costs $3,000 per CPU socket, regardless of the number of cores. With the Datacenter Edition, it allows for an unlimited number of virtual machines Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2003. If Microsoft Volume Licensing is included, the cost is essentially zero.

For an IT shop running Windows, the prime candidates for applications to use Hyper-V include Exchange, IIS, SQL Server, and Sharepoint. The virtualized environment would be supported by the same vendor as the applications. The cost of virtualization software cost is lumped in with Windows Server 2008, which would have been bought anyway.

Unless a Windows shop needs all of the features of VMware or Xen, the cost savings from buying a good, but not great solution is significant compared to the technically superior offerings from VMware or Citrix.


The copyright of the article Review of Microsoft's Hyper-V Virtualization in PC Software/OS is owned by John Wu. Permission to republish Review of Microsoft's Hyper-V Virtualization in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Windows Virtualization Solution With Hyper-V, Christian G
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo